Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] target/riscv: Restrict KVM-specific fields from ArchCPU

On 4/7/23 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote: On 4/5/23 09:04, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: These fields shouldn't be accessed when KVM is not available. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- RFC: The migration part is likely invalid... kvmtimer_needed() is defined in target/riscv/machine.c a

Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] target/riscv: Restrict KVM-specific fields from ArchCPU

On 4/5/23 09:04, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: These fields shouldn't be accessed when KVM is not available. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- RFC: The migration part is likely invalid... kvmtimer_needed() is defined in target/riscv/machine.c as static bool kvmtimer_needed(void *opa

Re: [RFC PATCH 09/10] target/riscv: Restrict KVM-specific fields from ArchCPU

On 4/5/23 13:04, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: These fields shouldn't be accessed when KVM is not available. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- RFC: The migration part is likely invalid... kvmtimer_needed() is defined in target/riscv/machine.c as static bool kvmtimer_needed(void

[RFC PATCH 09/10] target/riscv: Restrict KVM-specific fields from ArchCPU

These fields shouldn't be accessed when KVM is not available. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- RFC: The migration part is likely invalid... kvmtimer_needed() is defined in target/riscv/machine.c as static bool kvmtimer_needed(void *opaque) { return kvm_enabled(); } which d