On 5/19/21 2:40 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/19/21 9:20 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/18/21 1:36 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
The series is decomposed as:
- cleanups (1-6)
- clean ldst API using macros (7-13)
- add aligned ldst methods (14)
- add aligned memory methods (15-16
On 5/19/21 9:20 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/18/21 1:36 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The series is decomposed as:
>> - cleanups (1-6)
>> - clean ldst API using macros (7-13)
>> - add aligned ldst methods (14)
>> - add aligned memory methods (15-16)
>> - similar changes in virtio (17-
On 5/18/21 1:36 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
The series is decomposed as:
- cleanups (1-6)
- clean ldst API using macros (7-13)
- add aligned ldst methods (14)
- add aligned memory methods (15-16)
- similar changes in virtio (17-24)
- use the new methods on vring aligned values (25)
There a
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210518183655.1711377-1-phi...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20210518183655.1711377-1-phi...@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/25] exec: Add load
Hi,
This series is the result of a chat with Stefan after looking at
Peter response to Bibo on a problem with unoptimized memcpy()
leading to atomic issues:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg808209.html
MIPS R6 (32/64-bit) does support unaligned accesses, but for the
older rel
