Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/avocado: Re-enable gdbsim-r5f562n8 testing U-Boot

2024-08-05 Thread Alex Bennée
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes: > On 5/8/24 08:54, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >> On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 02:23:32 +0900, >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> >>> We disabled all RX tests on commit 9b45cc9931 ("docs/devel: >>> rationalise unstable gitlab tests under FLAKY_TESTS") for >>> being flaky. Howeve

Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/avocado: Re-enable gdbsim-r5f562n8 testing U-Boot

2024-08-05 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 5/8/24 08:54, Yoshinori Sato wrote: On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 02:23:32 +0900, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: We disabled all RX tests on commit 9b45cc9931 ("docs/devel: rationalise unstable gitlab tests under FLAKY_TESTS") for being flaky. However I don't recall the U-Boot test to fail (the problem

Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/avocado: Re-enable gdbsim-r5f562n8 testing U-Boot

2024-08-05 Thread Alex Bennée
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes: > We disabled all RX tests on commit 9b45cc9931 ("docs/devel: > rationalise unstable gitlab tests under FLAKY_TESTS") for > being flaky. However I don't recall the U-Boot test to fail > (the problematic line checking the 'version' string is already > commented out),

Re: [RFC PATCH] tests/avocado: Re-enable gdbsim-r5f562n8 testing U-Boot

2024-08-04 Thread Yoshinori Sato
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 02:23:32 +0900, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > We disabled all RX tests on commit 9b45cc9931 ("docs/devel: > rationalise unstable gitlab tests under FLAKY_TESTS") for > being flaky. However I don't recall the U-Boot test to fail > (the problematic line checking the 'version'

[RFC PATCH] tests/avocado: Re-enable gdbsim-r5f562n8 testing U-Boot

2024-08-01 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
We disabled all RX tests on commit 9b45cc9931 ("docs/devel: rationalise unstable gitlab tests under FLAKY_TESTS") for being flaky. However I don't recall the U-Boot test to fail (the problematic line checking the 'version' string is already commented out), and I'm running this test reliably, so re-