On 2/21/21 9:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 20:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> On 2/11/21 12:43 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks() function in cp0_timer where
>>> appropriate. This allows us to remove CPUMIPSState::cp0_count_ns
>>> a
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 20:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> On 2/11/21 12:43 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks() function in cp0_timer where
> > appropriate. This allows us to remove CPUMIPSState::cp0_count_ns
> > and mips_cp0_period_set().
> >
> > Signed-off-
On 2/11/21 12:43 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks() function in cp0_timer where
> appropriate. This allows us to remove CPUMIPSState::cp0_count_ns
> and mips_cp0_period_set().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> Based-on: <20210209132040.5091-1-peter
;
> Type: series
> Message-id: 20210210234334.3750022-1-f4...@amsat.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] target/mips/cp0_timer: Use new clock_ns_to_ticks()
>
> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> Switched to a new branch 'test'
> 86c0e95 target/mips/cp0_timer: Use new clock_ns_t
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210210234334.3750022-1-f4...@amsat.org/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20210210234334.3750022-1-f4...@amsat.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] target/mips/cp0_timer: Use
Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks() function in cp0_timer where
appropriate. This allows us to remove CPUMIPSState::cp0_count_ns
and mips_cp0_period_set().
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
Based-on: <20210209132040.5091-1-peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
RFC because this is just a starter patch to