On 15/12/22 15:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
This aids subsystems (like gdbstub) that want to trigger a flush
without pulling target specific headers.
[AJB: RFC because this is part of a larger gdbstub series but I wanted
to post for feedback in case anyone wants to suggest better naming].
Signed-off-
On 12/15/22 08:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
I'll rename and include when I send the gdbstub stuff. I don't know how
far you want to go to eliminate target specific handling from the rest
of TB maintenance - indeed I'm not sure anything else is possible?
I can't think that anything else is possible.
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 12/15/22 06:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> This aids subsystems (like gdbstub) that want to trigger a flush
>> without pulling target specific headers.
>> [AJB: RFC because this is part of a larger gdbstub series but I
>> wanted
>> to post for feedback in case anyone w
On 12/15/22 06:09, Alex Bennée wrote:
This aids subsystems (like gdbstub) that want to trigger a flush
without pulling target specific headers.
[AJB: RFC because this is part of a larger gdbstub series but I wanted
to post for feedback in case anyone wants to suggest better naming].
Signed-off-
This aids subsystems (like gdbstub) that want to trigger a flush
without pulling target specific headers.
[AJB: RFC because this is part of a larger gdbstub series but I wanted
to post for feedback in case anyone wants to suggest better naming].
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
include/exec/exec-
