On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 07:47:51PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/02/2023 16.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> > The cost/benefit tradeoff of dropping the platforms entirely
> > is not obviously favourable when we don't
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il ven 17 feb 2023, 19:47 Thomas Huth ha scritto:
>
>> On 17/02/2023 16.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> > The cost/benefit tradeoff of dropping the platforms entirely
>> > is not obviously fa
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 17/02/2023 16.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> ...
>> I'm also not so comfortable dropping the only version of SLES that we
>> explicitly target, when we don't know when their new major release
>> will arrive.
Il ven 17 feb 2023, 19:47 Thomas Huth ha scritto:
> On 17/02/2023 16.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> > The cost/benefit tradeoff of dropping the platforms entirely
> > is not obviously favourable when we don't have clea
On 17/02/2023 16.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The cost/benefit tradeoff of dropping the platforms entirely
is not obviously favourable when we don't have clear demand
to bump the min versions of native packages, and the co
On 17/02/2023 16.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
...
I'm also not so comfortable dropping the only version of SLES that we
explicitly target, when we don't know when their new major release
will arrive.
Let's hope that the next major
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
> > Our distro support policy has been written with a best-effort
> > estimation of what users and developers need. However, as we now
> > know, the support for older long-term distributions can get really
Thomas Huth writes:
> Our distro support policy has been written with a best-effort
> estimation of what users and developers need. However, as we now
> know, the support for older long-term distributions can get really
> troublesome for upstream development, since it is for example close
> to im
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Our distro support policy has been written with a best-effort
> estimation of what users and developers need. However, as we now
> know, the support for older long-term distributions can get really
> troublesome for upstream development
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/17/23 14:26, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Note: These changes mean that openSUSE is not considered as supported
> > anymore (since version 15.0 has been released in May 2018), and
> > RHEL/CentOS 8 will not be supported anymore in 3 mo
On 2/17/23 14:26, Thomas Huth wrote:
Note: These changes mean that openSUSE is not considered as supported
anymore (since version 15.0 has been released in May 2018), and
RHEL/CentOS 8 will not be supported anymore in 3 months (since version
8.0 has been released in May 2019).
Signed-off-by: Tho
Our distro support policy has been written with a best-effort
estimation of what users and developers need. However, as we now
know, the support for older long-term distributions can get really
troublesome for upstream development, since it is for example close
to impossible to keep the code for al
12 matches
Mail list logo
