On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:21:17PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:53:48PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > In cases where object_new() is not being passed a static, const
> > string, the caller cannot be sure what type they are instantiating.
> > There is a risk that instan
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:53:48PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> In cases where object_new() is not being passed a static, const
> string, the caller cannot be sure what type they are instantiating.
> There is a risk that instantiation could fail, if it is an abstract
> type.
>
> Convert such
In cases where object_new() is not being passed a static, const
string, the caller cannot be sure what type they are instantiating.
There is a risk that instantiation could fail, if it is an abstract
type.
Convert such cases over to use object_new_dynamic() such that they
are forced to expect fail
