Re: [RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:44 AM Warner Losh wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:39 AM Juan Quintela wrote: >> >>> Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea? >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >>> >> >> Reviewed by: Warner Losh >> >> This has been th

Re: [RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:44 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:39 AM Juan Quintela wrote: > >> Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea? >> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >> > > Reviewed by: Warner Losh > > This has been that way the bsd-user sources were re

Re: [RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:39 AM Juan Quintela wrote: > Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea? > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > Reviewed by: Warner Losh This has been that way the bsd-user sources were reorganized in 2015. I can find no good reason in the FreeBSD sources to

Re: [RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

On 5/10/23 15:39, Juan Quintela wrote: Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea? Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~

[RFC 1/3] ARM: Use normal types

Someone has a good reason why this is not a good idea? Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_reg.h index 070fa24da1..5f1eea4291 100644 --- a/bsd