On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:35:16 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> > of vCPUs.
> >
> > Exempl
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> of vCPUs.
>
> Exemple with a pseries guest on a bi-POWER9 socket system (128 HW threads):
>
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:43:10 +
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:05:16PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > > a serious slow down may
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:05:16 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> > of vCPUs.
> >
> > E
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:05:16PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> > of vCPUs.
> >
>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> of vCPUs.
>
> Exemple with a pseries guest on a bi-POWER9 socket system (128 HW threads):
>
Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
of vCPUs.
Exemple with a pseries guest on a bi-POWER9 socket system (128 HW threads):
1 0m20.922s 0m21.346s
2 0m21.230s
