Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson

2025-04-14 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
Ping: would like to hear John's thoughts on this series. We're likely to eliminate usage of avocado for functional testing in this dev cycle. That leaves python testing as the main outstanding bit of QEMU that is not natively using meson's test integration and also still pulling in avocado as a de

Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson

2025-02-25 Thread Markus Armbruster
Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:04:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> John, how does this mix with the linting parts of your "[PATCH 00/10] >> qapi: misc testing and doc patches"? > > Since this is only an RFC, I would expect that John's patch series can > simply igno

Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson

2025-02-25 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:04:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > John, how does this mix with the linting parts of your "[PATCH 00/10] > qapi: misc testing and doc patches"? Since this is only an RFC, I would expect that John's patch series can simply ignore this & merge when ready. If we deci

Re: [RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson

2025-02-24 Thread Markus Armbruster
John, how does this mix with the linting parts of your "[PATCH 00/10] qapi: misc testing and doc patches"?

[RFC 0/2] python: integrate linter tests natively with meson

2025-02-24 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
It seems everytime I post some new patches which touch python code I end up forgetting to run the extra non-default 'make check' target from the python/ subdir. IMHO, if we're going to pick up on linter failures in review feedback (which is a reasonable thing to want to do), then we should be runn