Re: [RFC] linux-user: Remove stale "not threadsafe" comments

2022-03-01 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 14/01/2022 à 16:50, Peter Maydell a écrit : In linux-user/signal.c we have two FIXME comments claiming that parts of the signal-handling code are not threadsafe. These are very old, as they were first introduced in commit 624f7979058 in 2008. Since then we've radically overhauled the signal-ha

Re: [RFC] linux-user: Remove stale "not threadsafe" comments

2022-01-15 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 2:49 AM Alex Bennée wrote: > > Peter Maydell writes: > > > In linux-user/signal.c we have two FIXME comments claiming that > > parts of the signal-handling code are not threadsafe. These are > > very old, as they were first introduced in commit 624f7979058 > > in 2008. Si

Re: [RFC] linux-user: Remove stale "not threadsafe" comments

2022-01-15 Thread Alex Bennée
Peter Maydell writes: > In linux-user/signal.c we have two FIXME comments claiming that > parts of the signal-handling code are not threadsafe. These are > very old, as they were first introduced in commit 624f7979058 > in 2008. Since then we've radically overhauled the signal-handling > logic,

[RFC] linux-user: Remove stale "not threadsafe" comments

2022-01-14 Thread Peter Maydell
In linux-user/signal.c we have two FIXME comments claiming that parts of the signal-handling code are not threadsafe. These are very old, as they were first introduced in commit 624f7979058 in 2008. Since then we've radically overhauled the signal-handling logic, while carefully preserving these FI