On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:13:07 -0400
Gregory Price wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > >
> > > i.e. an SLD does not require an FM-Owned LD for management, but an MHD,
> > > MLD, and DCD all do (at least in theory).
> >
> > DCD 'might' though I don't th
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > i.e. an SLD does not require an FM-Owned LD for management, but an MHD,
> > MLD, and DCD all do (at least in theory).
>
> DCD 'might' though I don't think anything in the spec rules that you 'must'
> control the SLD/MLD via
On Tue, 16 May 2023 02:20:07 -0400
Gregory Price wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:18:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:50:33 -0400
> > Gregory Price wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Ambiguity #1:
> > >
> > > * An SLD contains 1 Logical Device.
> > > * An MH-SLD present
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 05:18:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:50:33 -0400
> Gregory Price wrote:
>
> >
> > Ambiguity #1:
> >
> > * An SLD contains 1 Logical Device.
> > * An MH-SLD presents multiple SLDs, one per head.
> >
> > Ergo an MH-SLD contains multiple LDs w
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:50:33 -0400
Gregory Price wrote:
Hi Gregory,
Sorry I took so long to reply to this. Busy month...
Vince presented at LSF-MM so I feel it's fair game to CC him kernel
patches and he may be able to point you in right direction for a few
things in this mail.
> Originally I
Originally I was planning to kick this off with a patch set, but i've
decided my current prototype does not fit the extensibility requirements
to go from SLD to MH-SLD to MH-MLD.
So instead I'd like to kick off by just discussing the data structures
and laugh/cry a bit about some of the frustrati
