On 03/07/15 09:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 July 2015 at 09:13, Mark Cave-Ayland
> wrote:
>> On 13/06/15 16:06, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> Ping? I've just done an OpenBIOS test run on qemu-system-sparc64 and I'm
>>> still seeing this message appear on the console. Any chance we can get
>>> t
On 3 July 2015 at 09:13, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 13/06/15 16:06, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> Ping? I've just done an OpenBIOS test run on qemu-system-sparc64 and I'm
>> still seeing this message appear on the console. Any chance we can get
>> this fixed for 2.4?
>
> Ping again?
rth submitted
On 13/06/15 16:06, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 20/05/15 13:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2015 at 12:55, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05/20 11:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell
On 20/05/15 13:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 12:55, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> On Wed, 05/20 11:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2015 at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Ts
On 20 May 2015 at 12:55, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 05/20 11:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 20 May 2015 at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at
On Wed, 05/20 11:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>
On 20 May 2015 at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> >> Re patch c7ff5482. What's the point of this erro
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> Re patch c7ff5482. What's the point of this error?
> >> It's going to always appear for older targets tha
On 19 May 2015 at 20:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Re patch c7ff5482. What's the point of this error?
>> It's going to always appear for older targets that
>> predate such new fangled things as msix.
>>
>> Obviously the patch
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:54:36AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Re patch c7ff5482. What's the point of this error?
> It's going to always appear for older targets that
> predate such new fangled things as msix.
>
> Obviously the patch has been there a while, and it's
> not actually causing a
Re patch c7ff5482. What's the point of this error?
It's going to always appear for older targets that
predate such new fangled things as msix.
Obviously the patch has been there a while, and it's
not actually causing any problems, but today it got
on my nerves...
r~
11 matches
Mail list logo