On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 02:53:43PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 12:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:22:37PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > On 01/05/2018 11:49 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 07:15:38PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > > > O
On 01/09/2018 12:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:22:37PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
On 01/05/2018 11:49 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 07:15:38PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
On 01/04/2018 06:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:22:37PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 11:49 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 07:15:38PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > On 01/04/2018 06:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>
On 01/05/2018 11:49 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 07:15:38PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
On 01/04/2018 06:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
I'm not going to prototype this yet, I'm working on virtio-vhost-user
first
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:53:07PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:21:51PM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> > the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> > initializat
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 07:15:38PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 01/04/2018 06:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >
> > I'm not going to prototype this yet, I'm working on virtio-vhost-user
> > first, but eventually I might get back
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:21:51PM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Hi,
> Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> initialization (e.g. feature bit negotiation) and so it is simplest to
> assume that the
On 01/04/2018 06:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
I'm not going to prototype this yet, I'm working on virtio-vhost-user
first, but eventually I might get back to -object vhost-user(-backend).
Hi Stefan, are you implementing the g
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 06:01:29AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi,
> > Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> > the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> > initialization (e.g. feature bit negotia
Hi
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> initialization (e.g. feature bit negotiation) and so it is simplest to
> assume that the master is already available and
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 02:45:48PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 12/19 16:21, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> > the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> > initialization (e.g. feature bit negotiat
On Tue, 12/19 16:21, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Hi,
> Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
> the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
> initialization (e.g. feature bit negotiation) and so it is simplest to
> assume that the master is already ava
Hi,
Vhost-user implementations assume the slave is already running before
the master starts. The slave is required during virtio device
initialization (e.g. feature bit negotiation) and so it is simplest to
assume that the master is already available and will respond immediately
to the VHOST_USER_
13 matches
Mail list logo
