On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:40 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Ma
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:40 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:24:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Is this wit
Am 16.05.2013 10:40, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:24:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Is this with or without vhost-ne
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:24:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Is this with or without vhost-net in host?
> >
> > never mind, I see it's without.
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:24:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Is this with or without vhost-net in host?
>
> never mind, I see it's without.
> Try to enable vhost-net (you'll have to switch to -netdev syntax
> for that t
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:00:03PM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:49 +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> > /sys/devices/virtual/net/t100/tun_flags is 0x5002 - so it looks like
> > IFF_ONE_QUEUE was indeed unset by qemu (which is lacking the patch). It
> > surpri
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:24:05AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:00:03PM +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:49 +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> > > /sys/devices/virtual/net/t100/tun_flags is 0x5002 - so it looks like
> > > IF
Hi again,
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:49 +0100, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> /sys/devices/virtual/net/t100/tun_flags is 0x5002 - so it looks like
> IFF_ONE_QUEUE was indeed unset by qemu (which is lacking the patch). It
> surprises me, but that's probably my fault, rather than qemu's.
I've rebuilt 1.4.
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:28 +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Please check the tunnel mode in sysfs after your VM is started. It is likely
> that qemu overwrites the settings you made in the ruby script.
>
> Please check if the patch
>
> tap: set IFF_ONE_QUEUE per default
>
> is in your qemu 1.
On 14.05.2013 16:21, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 08:06 +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
For future, we can try to set TUN_ONE_QUEUE flag on the interface,
or try applying this patch
5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
in ke
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 08:06 +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > For future, we can try to set TUN_ONE_QUEUE flag on the interface,
> > or try applying this patch
> > 5d097109257c03a71845729f8db6b5770c4bbedc
> > in kernel see if this helps.
> >
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 12.02.2013 um 10:54 schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" :
>
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> 12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> []
> >>
> >> Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoti
Am 12.02.2013 um 10:54 schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" :
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> []
>>
>> Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoting just a bit? ;)
>>
> If have set this option for 2 weeks now and not se
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote:
> []
>
> Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoting just a bit? ;)
>
> >>> If have set this option for 2 weeks now and not seen this problem again.
> >>> How does this flag work with the r
12.02.2013 13:10, Peter Lieven wrote:
[]
Guys, can we please trim the excessive quoting just a bit? ;)
>>> If have set this option for 2 weeks now and not seen this problem again.
>>> How does this flag work with the recently added tap multiqueue support?
This will be the only option in 3.8.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:10:24AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 12.02.2013 um 10:08 schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" :
>
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:06:04AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lie
Am 12.02.2013 um 10:08 schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" :
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:06:04AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fr
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:06:04AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>
On 23.01.2013 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 0
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven w
On 22.01.2013 10:04, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
is anyone aware of a problem wi
On 23.11.2012 12:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very r
Am 23.11.2012 08:02, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare
>> circumstances stops
>> a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
>>
>> My problem occurs in conjuncti
Am 23.11.2012 um 12:01 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very
> >> rare circumstances stops
> >> a
Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare
>> circumstances stops
>> a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
>>
>> My problem occurs in conj
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare
> circumstances stops
> a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
>
> My problem occurs in conjunction with vanilla qemu-kvm-1.2.0 and Ubuntu
> Kernel
Hi,
is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare
circumstances stops
a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
My problem occurs in conjunction with vanilla qemu-kvm-1.2.0 and Ubuntu Kernel
3.2.0-34.53
which is based on Linux 3.2.33.
I was not yet able to r
28 matches
Mail list logo