19.05.2013 16:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:56:03PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Ping #2?
>>>
>>> 06.04.2013 10:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This patch was submitted more than a year ago (at Jan-2012).
Is it
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:56:03PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Ping #2?
> >
> > 06.04.2013 10:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> This patch was submitted more than a year ago (at Jan-2012).
> >> Is it still needed? If yes, why it hasn't been
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Ping #2?
>
> 06.04.2013 10:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> This patch was submitted more than a year ago (at Jan-2012).
>> Is it still needed? If yes, why it hasn't been applied?
Well, is it still needed?
>>
>> It still applies cleanly to t
Ping #2?
06.04.2013 10:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> This patch was submitted more than a year ago (at Jan-2012).
> Is it still needed? If yes, why it hasn't been applied?
>
> It still applies cleanly to the current git, with the exception
> of s|^|ldscripts/| - sparc.ld moved from the top direct
This patch was submitted more than a year ago (at Jan-2012).
Is it still needed? If yes, why it hasn't been applied?
It still applies cleanly to the current git, with the exception
of s|^|ldscripts/| - sparc.ld moved from the top directory to
ldscripts/.
(Ref: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1
