On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Hello!
> QEMU uses the ACPI Vendor ID "QEMU" in some of the ACPI tables
> it generates. This is a bit of a spec violation:
> all IDs must be registered with the ASWG.
>
> From the ASWG point of view, things are easier if a legal
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 June 2015 at 15:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > QEMU uses the ACPI Vendor ID "QEMU" in some of the ACPI tables
> > it generates. This is a bit of a spec violation:
> > all IDs must be registered with the ASWG.
> >
On 23 June 2015 at 15:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Hello!
> QEMU uses the ACPI Vendor ID "QEMU" in some of the ACPI tables
> it generates. This is a bit of a spec violation:
> all IDs must be registered with the ASWG.
>
> From the ASWG point of view, things are easier if a legal entity owns a
>
Hello!
QEMU uses the ACPI Vendor ID "QEMU" in some of the ACPI tables
it generates. This is a bit of a spec violation:
all IDs must be registered with the ASWG.
>From the ASWG point of view, things are easier if a legal entity owns a
vendor ID, so Red Hat could ask to own the ID on behalf of the
c
