Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Jeff Cody
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:08:20PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/30/2017 08:22 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 03/30/2017 08:05 PM, Alexandru Avadanii wrote: > >> c7cacb3e7a2e9fdf929c993b98268e4179147cbb is the first bad commit > >> block/rbd: parse all options via bdrv_parse_filename > > > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/30/2017 08:22 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/30/2017 08:05 PM, Alexandru Avadanii wrote: >> c7cacb3e7a2e9fdf929c993b98268e4179147cbb is the first bad commit >> block/rbd: parse all options via bdrv_parse_filename > > Yep, my bisect finished about 2 minutes after your email on the same > s

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/30/2017 08:05 PM, Alexandru Avadanii wrote: > c7cacb3e7a2e9fdf929c993b98268e4179147cbb is the first bad commit > block/rbd: parse all options via bdrv_parse_filename Yep, my bisect finished about 2 minutes after your email on the same spot. I'm working on a patch. I can reproduce the pr

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
rmband; Jeff Cody; Markus Armbruster > Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs > > Hi, Eric, > Thank you for looking into this! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, Eric, Thank you for looking into this! > -Original Message- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 3:40 AM > To: Alexandru Avadanii; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: svc-armband; Jeff Cody; Markus Armbruster > Subject: Re: [Qemu-de

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/30/2017 06:42 PM, Alexandru Avadanii wrote: > Hi, > While testing out 2.9.0-rc2 on AArch64, we noticed a possible regression in > QEMU, related to parsing -drive 'file=rbd/...': >> "conf option 6789 has no value". > > Instance logs [1]. Pastebins don't last forever; it helps to paste the a

[Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, While testing out 2.9.0-rc2 on AArch64, we noticed a possible regression in QEMU, related to parsing -drive 'file=rbd/...': > "conf option 6789 has no value". Instance logs [1]. Occasionally, we get "conf option too long", with the same effect. We bisected this manually between 2.8.0 (workin