Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu optimization

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Brook
> I just downloaded the patched tree off your page. Tried to build it > (./configure && make) compiling on Debian GNU/Linux, gcc version 3.3 but > no-workey. > Any idea what I'm doing wrong (I haven't given it a hard look yet)? Fixed. Paul ___ Qemu-de

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu optimization

2005-08-30 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:17 +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > You might want to look at my hand-coded backed for qemu. The intention is > that > this will eventually replace dyngen/gcc altogether. Currently everything > except the experimental m68k target uses a mixture of the old and the > micro-ops

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu optimization

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Brook
> > Without them, there is no native code run by qemu - everything is > > translated. > > Yep. But even in that situation, there will always be room for > improvement in how the dynamic code generator works. > > I wonder, has anyone tried doing a peephole optimizer? Translate key > instruction sequ

[Qemu-devel] qemu optimization

2005-08-30 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:59 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote: > Um, KQEMU/qvm86 don't do dynamic translation. They are virtualizers. They run > the code given to them (more or less) unchanged. Sorry, I was speaking more generally (and imprecisely) about the qemu/kqemu as a combination. As you state belo