On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:39:46PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On 06/21/2012 07:51 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I just noticed libvirt tries to use the -numa option in a way that qemu
> > >never understood:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:39:46PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 07:51 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just noticed libvirt tries to use the -numa option in a way that qemu
> >never understood: if a node is configured to have a non-contiguous set
> >of CPUs, it tries to ge
On 06/21/2012 07:51 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed libvirt tries to use the -numa option in a way that qemu
never understood: if a node is configured to have a non-contiguous set
of CPUs, it tries to generate a command-line option that looks like:
"-numa node,nodeid=...,cpus=0,2,
Hi,
I just noticed libvirt tries to use the -numa option in a way that qemu
never understood: if a node is configured to have a non-contiguous set
of CPUs, it tries to generate a command-line option that looks like:
"-numa node,nodeid=...,cpus=0,2,4,mem=..."
^
But
