21.01.2013 22:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
We in debian talked about splitting qemu-system into
individual target packages for a long time, and there's
a patch (almost current) to support it, in qemu-system-split-mjt
branch of qemu debian git tree (I'll refresh it hopefully
today).
[...]
Heck. T
On 21 January 2013 19:53, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Note that, as far as I understand, upstream is moving towards a single
> binary which can emulate any target (sort of like busybox).
That is slightly overstating the case -- I think it's an aspiration,
but not one that anybody's currently activel
21.01.2013 23:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:58:48PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
We in debian talked about splitting qemu-system into
individual target packages for a long time, and there's
a patch (almost current) to support it, in qemu-system-split-mjt
branch of qem
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:58:48PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> We in debian talked about splitting qemu-system into
> individual target packages for a long time, and there's
> a patch (almost current) to support it, in qemu-system-split-mjt
> branch of qemu debian git tree (I'll refresh it hope
We in debian talked about splitting qemu-system into
individual target packages for a long time, and there's
a patch (almost current) to support it, in qemu-system-split-mjt
branch of qemu debian git tree (I'll refresh it hopefully
today).
I think it's time to decide whenever we want to do that
o
