Il 30/09/2013 11:49, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
> Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html
>
> Although I don't see from it how the syntax for -cpus will look like
> from that QAPI magic except that it is an
>
> + '*cpus': ['uint16'],
It's "-numa node,cpus=0
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:05:10AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think there are already patches on the list to do that, as part of
> the NUMA memory binding series from Wanlong Gao.
Yeah: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-09/msg02833.html
Although I don't see from it how the s
Il 29/09/2013 17:10, Borislav Petkov ha scritto:
> Btw,
>
> while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
> feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
> for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
> example:
>
> x86_64-soft
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Btw,
>
> while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
> feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
> for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
> example:
Btw,
while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we
feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus
for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for
example:
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 8 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0\;2\;4-5
