On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:49:16PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2017 10:46 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> > On 03/22/17 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > I
On 27 March 2017 at 09:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> ISTR some surprises that reset (or some other) callbacks were not
> called as expected if there wasn't a sysbus device among the ancestors.
> Don't know if that's still true.
Yes -- if you're a sysbus device then your reset method is
called. If yo
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:23:18 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:08:56PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
> > > plug into a bus, period. The ones
On 24.03.2017 18:59, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
>>> plug into a bus, period. The ones that really didn't were made to plug
>>> into "sysbus".
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:08:56PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
> > plug into a bus, period. The ones that really didn't were made to plug
> > into "sysbus".
> >
> > Pret
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:13:48PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 13:48, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > The problem with today's mechanism is that we have no way to make
> > a machine accept one type of sysbus device without making it
> > start accepting every other sysbus devices.
On 24 March 2017 at 17:59, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>> This isn't really true. Sysbus devices support having MMIO regions
>> and IRQ lines and GPIO lines. If you need those you're a
>> sysbus device; otherwise you can probably just be a plain old Device.
>
> Well, "device
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
>> plug into a bus, period. The ones that really didn't were made to plug
>> into "sysbus".
>>
>> Pretty much the only thing "sysbus" devices had
On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
> plug into a bus, period. The ones that really didn't were made to plug
> into "sysbus".
>
> Pretty much the only thing "sysbus" devices had in common was that they
> could
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:49:16PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> On 03/22/2017 10:46 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> > On 03/22/17 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
>> > > sysbus device
On 24 March 2017 at 13:48, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The problem with today's mechanism is that we have no way to make
> a machine accept one type of sysbus device without making it
> start accepting every other sysbus devices. If we thought all
> !cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet sysbus devi
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:49:16PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 10:46 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 03/22/17 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
> > > sysbus device support on each of QEMU's machine
On 22.03.2017 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
> sysbus device support on each of QEMU's machine types. The good
> news is that almost all has_dynamic_sysbus=1 machines have their
> own internal (often short) whitelist of suppo
On 03/22/2017 10:46 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 03/22/17 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Hi,
I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
sysbus device support on each of QEMU's machine types. The good
news is that almost all has_dynamic_sysbus=1 machines have their
own internal
On 03/22/17 21:31, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
> sysbus device support on each of QEMU's machine types. The good
> news is that almost all has_dynamic_sysbus=1 machines have their
> own internal (often short) whitelist of support
Hi,
I am investigating the current status of has_dynamic_sysbus and
sysbus device support on each of QEMU's machine types. The good
news is that almost all has_dynamic_sysbus=1 machines have their
own internal (often short) whitelist of supported sysbus device
types, and automatically reject unsup
16 matches
Mail list logo
