On 16/10/2014 11:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:35:46PM +0100, Leon Alrae wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
>> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
>> and bug fixes which are stuc
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:35:46PM +0100, Leon Alrae wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
> and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone have an idea how
> to impro
Hi Peter,
On 01/10/2014 17:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 October 2014 16:35, Leon Alrae wrote:
>> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
>> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
>> and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone hav
Hi Leon,
Am 01.10.2014 um 17:35 schrieb Leon Alrae:
> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
> and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone have an idea how
> to improve this situation? Wouldn
On 1 October 2014 16:35, Leon Alrae wrote:
> I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
> reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
> and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone have an idea how
> to improve this situation? Wouldn't it hel
Hi All,
I noticed that it's quite difficult to get target-mips changes
reviewed/accepted. There is already a queue of relatively big features
and bug fixes which are stuck for months. Does anyone have an idea how
to improve this situation? Wouldn't it help to have a target-mips
co-maintainer assis
