On 11/10/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
> >
> > Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
>
> Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines that boot off flash, I
> will try to come up with some logi
On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines that boot off flash, I
will try to come up with some logical synatx. The Palm T|E board can
boot off the ROM and it needs no kern
mu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] multiple boot devices
> > Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:04:40 +0100
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:18 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > > > It restrict
What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Forwarded Message
> From: J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] multiple boot devices
> Date: Mon, 05 No
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:18 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > It restricts the letter to the ones historically allowed by Qemu, not to
> > > > anything specific to any architecture or hw platform. What I like in my
> > > > implementation, compared to the strchr..., is
