Hi Thomas,
> did you ever sent the patch? I can't find it on the mailing list, and I think
>this bug is still pending?Yes, I have patches but was waiting for my first one
>to be successful in order to make sure I got the process down. I will finish
>that shortly.
CheersLuc
On 24/01/2019 1
On 24/01/2019 14.38, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Lucien Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel writes:
>
>>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019, 3:08:07 AM GMT+9, Emilio G. Cota
>> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 15:58:27 +, Lucien
>> Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:> > Hi folks,
I noticed that with 3
On 24/01/2019 13:59, Lucien Anti-Spam wrote:
>
>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019, 3:08:07 AM GMT+9, Emilio G. Cota
> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 15:58:27 +, Lucien Anti-Spam via
> Qemu-devel wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> > I noticed that with 3.x release that the GDB options (-S -s) for
Lucien Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel writes:
>
>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019, 3:08:07 AM GMT+9, Emilio G. Cota
> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 15:58:27 +, Lucien
> Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:> > Hi folks,
>> > I noticed that with 3.x release that the GDB options (-S -s) for
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019, 3:08:07 AM GMT+9, Emilio G. Cota
wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 15:58:27 +, Lucien
Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:> > Hi folks,
> > I noticed that with 3.x release that the GDB options (-S -s) for certain
> > CPU results in very weird stepping.Usua
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 15:58:27 +, Lucien Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I noticed that with 3.x release that the GDB options (-S -s) for certain CPU
> results in very weird stepping.Usually stops afer a few steps, whilst the
> stub continues responding the PC doesnt update, h
Hi folks,
I noticed that with 3.x release that the GDB options (-S -s) for certain CPU
results in very weird stepping.Usually stops afer a few steps, whilst the stub
continues responding the PC doesnt update, however, I have only deeply looked
at the m68k.
In the case of the m68K the SR gets the
