Am 18.04.2016 um 13:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one befo
Hello,
Peter wrote:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one before full release.
>
> This is the
Peter Maydell writes:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one before full release.
>
> This is t
Am 18.04.2016 um 13:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one befo
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:10:12AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 13:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> > Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> > the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> > I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 t
Am 18.04.2016 um 13:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one befo
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:23:06PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 18/04/16 12:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> > Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> > the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> > I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarbal
On 18 April 2016 at 14:44, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 15:02 schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Hi Stefan -- I see you added "update the translation po/ files"
>> to the list. Can you remind me how to do this? I think it's
>> just "make -C po update", which seems to update the creation
>> date ti
Am 18.04.2016 um 15:02 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 18 April 2016 at 12:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> This is therefore the last call for any bugs that need to be fixed
>> for 2.6 or patches that must go in. If you have anything you think
>> should go into 2.6 please either add it to the "still unfix
On 18 April 2016 at 12:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This is therefore the last call for any bugs that need to be fixed
> for 2.6 or patches that must go in. If you have anything you think
> should go into 2.6 please either add it to the "still unfixed in
> master" part of the planning wiki page or f
Hello,
Peter wrote:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one before full release.
>
> This is the
On 18/04/16 12:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
> the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
> I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
> week to be the final one before full relea
Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and
the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release.
I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this
week to be the final one before full release.
This is therefore the last call for any bugs
13 matches
Mail list logo