On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:36:42AM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 20:40, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:52:08PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 4 February 2014 16:37, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> > On 4 February 2014 16:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
On 4 February 2014 20:40, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:52:08PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 February 2014 16:37, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> > On 4 February 2014 16:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 4 February 2014 15:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> >> > I just wanted
Hello Peter,
thank you for your answer,
On 4 February 2014 16:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 4 February 2014 15:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > I just wanted to ask what is the current state of kvm control for
> > qemu-system-aarch64.
> > I tried latest mainline but I think it's not all there y
Hello Peter,
I just wanted to ask what is the current state of kvm control for
qemu-system-aarch64.
I tried latest mainline but I think it's not all there yet (it complains
about missing cpu when I use -M virt and -cpu host, so I suspect some of
VOS patches are still missing).
Is your aarch64-kvm
On 4 February 2014 15:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> I just wanted to ask what is the current state of kvm control for
> qemu-system-aarch64.
> I tried latest mainline but I think it's not all there yet (it complains
> about missing cpu when I use -M virt and -cpu host, so I suspect some of VOS
> pa
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:52:08PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 16:37, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > On 4 February 2014 16:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 4 February 2014 15:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> > I just wanted to ask what is the current state of kvm control for
> >>
On 4 February 2014 16:37, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 4 February 2014 16:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 February 2014 15:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> > I just wanted to ask what is the current state of kvm control for
>> > qemu-system-aarch64.
>> > I tried latest mainline but I think it's not