On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:27 PM Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
> virtual machine.
>
>
>
> i386 (32 bit) emulation uses this register (in wrmsr and in MMU fault
> processing).
>
> But it does not included in VMSt
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 05:00:28PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 08:54:38AM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > > From: Peter Xu [mailto:pet...@redhat.com]
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:26:39PM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I found
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 08:54:38AM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > From: Peter Xu [mailto:pet...@redhat.com]
> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:26:39PM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
> > > v
> From: Peter Xu [mailto:pet...@redhat.com]
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:26:39PM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> >
> > I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
> > virtual machine.
> >
> >
> >
> > i386 (32 bit) emulation uses this register (in wr
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:26:39PM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
> virtual machine.
>
>
>
> i386 (32 bit) emulation uses this register (in wrmsr and in MMU fault
> processing).
Sorry if this questi
> From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert [mailto:dgilb...@redhat.com]
> * Pavel Dovgalyuk (dovga...@ispras.ru) wrote:
> > > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> > > On 29/05/19 13:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > >> Should we add a section for i386, which duplicates efer, or just
> > >
* Pavel Dovgalyuk (dovga...@ispras.ru) wrote:
> > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> > On 29/05/19 13:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > >> Should we add a section for i386, which duplicates efer, or just
> > >> version_id of the main
> > VMSD should
> > >> be updated?
> > >
> >
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> On 29/05/19 13:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> Should we add a section for i386, which duplicates efer, or just
> >> version_id of the main
> VMSD should
> >> be updated?
> >
> > You could do:
> >
> > #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> > VMST
On 29/05/19 13:30, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> Should we add a section for i386, which duplicates efer, or just version_id
>> of the main VMSD should
>> be updated?
>
> You could do:
>
> #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> VMSTATE_UINT64(env.efer, X86CPU),
> VMSTATE_UINT64(env.star, X86C
* Pavel Dovgalyuk (dovga...@ispras.ru) wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
> virtual machine.
>
>
>
> i386 (32 bit) emulation uses this register (in wrmsr and in MMU fault
> processing).
>
> But it does not included in VMState
Hello!
I found this while debugging the inconsistent saved/restored state of the
virtual machine.
i386 (32 bit) emulation uses this register (in wrmsr and in MMU fault
processing).
But it does not included in VMState, because "efer" field is disabled with
#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
I thin
11 matches
Mail list logo