On 5/20/07, Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/20/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think Qemu should reject -net user only. Currently that seems to
> > > mean that there is no nic, but still the vlan is connected to slirp
> > > stack. That does not make any sense.
>
> If
On 5/20/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think Qemu should reject -net user only. Currently that seems to
> > mean that there is no nic, but still the vlan is connected to slirp
> > stack. That does not make any sense.
If you do this, do it properly and warn if any qemu vlans have
> So the issue on sparc was that the device is relied on by the
> SS-5 platform code (it sounds like sun4m has this device on-board at
> a fixed offset, non-pci), but not initialized properly due to the lack
> of -net nic? Should sun4m imply -net nic,model=lance then? It doesn't
> make much sense
On Sun, 20 May 2007 11:25:25 +0100
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my past experience, -net user implies -net nic.
>
> You are mistaken. -net user does not imply -net nic.
I just tested this. You are absolutely right, I was wrong about the
behavior on x86.
> > Hmm. -net performs
> > I think Qemu should reject -net user only. Currently that seems to
> > mean that there is no nic, but still the vlan is connected to slirp
> > stack. That does not make any sense.
If you do this, do it properly and warn if any qemu vlans have a single device
attached.
> In my past experience
On Sun, 20 May 2007 10:10:20 +0300
"Blue Swirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've verified your patch fixes the crash for me. But I'm curious,
> > have I been running qemu in a nonstandard fashion, then? (Should I
> > be specifying more than just "-net user", normally?)
> >
> > If so, I can ma
I've verified your patch fixes the crash for me. But I'm curious, have
I been running qemu in a nonstandard fashion, then? (Should I be
specifying more than just "-net user", normally?)
If so, I can make up a patch to amend the documentation.
I think Qemu should reject -net user only. Current
On Sat, 19 May 2007 22:08:23 +0300
"Blue Swirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch fixes the crash. But I'm not convinced it's the right one,
> perhaps the default net parameter logic could be improved instead:
> /* init network clients */
> if (nb_net_clients == 0) {
> /* if n
On 5/19/07, Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/19/07, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The weird thing is, when I add "-net nic,model=lance" to my command line
> right before "-net user", the crash does not occur. I kinda assumed from
> the above backtrace that the lance driver w
On 5/19/07, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The weird thing is, when I add "-net nic,model=lance" to my command line
right before "-net user", the crash does not occur. I kinda assumed from
the above backtrace that the lance driver was selected on sparc32 by
default...
Thanks for testin
Hi,
I've been trying to get Debian installed on a virtual sparc box,
running on a x86 Linux host. I get a reproducible crash early in the
installation process, when the sparc kernel tries to load the lance
driver.
I have configured qemu with:
./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-slirp --enable-ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
