Am 25.02.2016 um 20:53 schrieb John Snow:
On 02/25/2016 02:49 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 22.02.2016 um 23:08 schrieb John Snow:
On 02/22/2016 03:21 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hello,
is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
drive backup job?
S
On 02/25/2016 02:49 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>
> Am 22.02.2016 um 23:08 schrieb John Snow:
>>
>>
>> On 02/22/2016 03:21 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
>>> drive backup job?
>>>
>>> See:
>>> http://
On Thu, 02/25 08:49, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>
> Am 22.02.2016 um 23:08 schrieb John Snow:
> >
> >
> > On 02/22/2016 03:21 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
> >> drive backup job?
> >>
> >> See:
> >>
Am 22.02.2016 um 23:08 schrieb John Snow:
>
>
> On 02/22/2016 03:21 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
>> drive backup job?
>>
>> See:
>> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=block/backup.c;h=16105d40b193be9bb403460
On 02/22/2016 03:21 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
> drive backup job?
>
> See:
> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=block/backup.c;h=16105d40b193be9bb40346027bdf58e62b956a96;hb=98d2c6f2cd80afaa2dc10091f5e35a97c
Hello,
is there any chance or hack to work with a bigger cluster size for the
drive backup job?
See:
http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=block/backup.c;h=16105d40b193be9bb40346027bdf58e62b956a96;hb=98d2c6f2cd80afaa2dc10091f5e35a97c181e4f5
This is very slow with ceph - may be due to the 6
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/09/2013 00:46, Wolfgang Richter ha scritto:
> All writes to the drive-backup source have to first copy the pre-write
> data to the target. Thus, drive-backup usually works best if you are
> using werror=stop on the source. That said,
Il 30/09/2013 00:46, Wolfgang Richter ha scritto:
> I wanted to explore overhead with the new drive-backup command and I
> noticed if I set the target to something like '/dev/null' the guest VM
> starts having IO errors and loses write access to its root file
> system. Here is the qmp-shell comman
I wanted to explore overhead with the new drive-backup command and I
noticed if I set the target to something like '/dev/null' the guest VM
starts having IO errors and loses write access to its root file
system. Here is the qmp-shell command I'm using:
> drive-backup sync=none device=virtio0 targ