Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug

2015-10-22 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 22.10.2015 um 03:27 schrieb Zhu Guihua: > May I know whether the discussion is still ongoing? We did have some discussions at KVM Forum, you may want to check the video recording of my CPU hot-plug talk (end was cut off, I think). > I checked Andreas's git tree, there was no changes about

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug

2015-10-21 Thread Zhu Guihua
Hi all, May I know whether the discussion is still ongoing? I checked Andreas's git tree, there was no changes about the topology. Plz let me know the schedule about this. Thanks, Zhu On 04/07/2015 08:43 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-27 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:17:36AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:32:33PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:43:43PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. > > > > > > The m

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-23 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:32:33PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:43:43PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. > > > > The more I wrote, there more I became uncertain if we really came to a > > conc

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-23 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:32:33PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:43:43PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. > > > > The more I wrote, there more I became uncertain if we really came to a > > conc

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-23 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:43:43PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. > > The more I wrote, there more I became uncertain if we really came to a > conclusion and became more certain that we want to define the QMP/HMP/CLI >

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug

2015-04-08 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 07.04.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Igor Mammedov: >> >> power >> - Topology possible >>- interfaces to query topology? > ? I wanted to say: I forgot all the details about topology > >> - SMT: Power8: no threads in host and full core passed in due to HW >> design may change in the future >> >> s/

Re: [Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-07 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:43:43 +0200 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. > > The more I wrote, there more I became uncertain if we really came to > a conclusion and became more certain that we want to define the > QMP/HMP/CLI interf

[Qemu-devel] cpu modelling and hotplug (was: [PATCH RFC 0/4] target-i386: PC socket/core/thread modeling, part 1)

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Borntraeger
We had a call and I was asked to write a summary about our conclusion. The more I wrote, there more I became uncertain if we really came to a conclusion and became more certain that we want to define the QMP/HMP/CLI interfaces first (or quite early in the process) As discussed I will provide an