Am 24.02.2014 17:39, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 24/02/2014 15:37, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
>> On Mon, 02/24 14:48, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wonder if the current output of get_block_status for compressed VMDKs is
>>> correct or
>>> if we need this patch?:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/vmdk
Il 24/02/2014 15:37, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
On Mon, 02/24 14:48, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if the current output of get_block_status for compressed VMDKs is
correct or
if we need this patch?:
diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
index ff6f5ee..5fa29b0 100644
--- a/block/vmdk.c
+++ b
On Mon, 02/24 14:48, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if the current output of get_block_status for compressed VMDKs is
> correct or
> if we need this patch?:
>
> diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
> index ff6f5ee..5fa29b0 100644
> --- a/block/vmdk.c
> +++ b/block/vmdk.c
> @@ -1146,7
Hi,
I wonder if the current output of get_block_status for compressed VMDKs is
correct or
if we need this patch?:
diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
index ff6f5ee..5fa29b0 100644
--- a/block/vmdk.c
+++ b/block/vmdk.c
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn
vmdk_co_get_block_sta
