On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:48:19AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 02:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 09/19/2011 03:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wro
On 09/28/2011 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:48:19AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/22/2011 02:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I'm guessing that if we find a correct ber structure in the file, this
most likely means the key is correct.
[I still would add at
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:48:19AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 02:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 09/19/2011 03:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wro
On 09/22/2011 02:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/19/2011 03:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/17/2011 03:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 03:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 09/17/2011 03:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wro
On 09/19/2011 03:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/17/2011 03:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
The checksuming I think makes sense if encryption is being added so
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:22:02PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/17/2011 03:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 09/16/2011 10:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33:13AM -0400, Stefan Berger wro
On 09/17/2011 03:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/16/2011 10:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33:13AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So the below is a
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 10:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33:13AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>On 09/15/2011 08:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>So the below is a proposal for a directory scheme
> >>>for
On 09/16/2011 10:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33:13AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So the below is a proposal for a directory scheme
for storing (optionally multiple) nvram images,
along with any metadata.
Data is e
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:33:13AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 09/15/2011 08:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >So the below is a proposal for a directory scheme
> >for storing (optionally multiple) nvram images,
> >along with any metadata.
> >Data is encoded using BER:
> >http://en.wikipedia
On 09/15/2011 08:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So the below is a proposal for a directory scheme
for storing (optionally multiple) nvram images,
along with any metadata.
Data is encoded using BER:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Encoding_Rules
Specifically, we mostly use the subsets.
Would
So the below is a proposal for a directory scheme
for storing (optionally multiple) nvram images,
along with any metadata.
Data is encoded using BER:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Encoding_Rules
Specifically, we mostly use the subsets.
We use a directory as a SET in a CER format.
This allows
13 matches
Mail list logo
