Am 15.12.2013 12:17, schrieb Antony Pavlov:
> Can we use more detailed comments? E.g.
>
> typedef struct {
> /*< QOM service fields >*/
> MyParentClass parent_class;
> /*< class private fields >*/
>
> [any fields you need]
> } FooClass;
Since those c
Hi guys,
Am 16.12.2013 13:48, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
> wrote:
>> Why not add "protected" then for the fields that are only
>> meant to be accessible by the implementation but not
>> public ?
>>
>
> Ok by me if the documentation genera
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
wrote:
> Why not add "protected" then for the fields that are only
> meant to be accessible by the implementation but not
> public ?
>
Ok by me if the documentation generation can be cleanly and easily
taught to interpret this correctly. I d
Why not add "protected" then for the fields that are only
meant to be accessible by the implementation but not
public ?
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Peter Crosthwaite <
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
> > On 14 December 2013 23:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:06:30 +1000
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Antony Pavlov
> wrote:
> > Hi, Andreas!
> >
> > Here is a quote from http://wiki.qemu.org/QOMConventions
> >
> >> a FooClass structure definition containing at least the parent class
> >> field:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 December 2013 23:06, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Antony Pavlov
>> wrote:
>>> What do the "< private >" and "< public >" comments exactly mean here?
>>
>> Private means inaccessible to everybody, inc
On 14 December 2013 23:06, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Antony Pavlov
> wrote:
>> What do the "< private >" and "< public >" comments exactly mean here?
>
> Private means inaccessible to everybody, including the implementation
> of class being instantiated. No one
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> Hi, Andreas!
>
> Here is a quote from http://wiki.qemu.org/QOMConventions
>
>> a FooClass structure definition containing at least the parent class
>> field:
>>
>> typedef struct {
>> /*< private >*/
>> MyParentClass
Hi, Andreas!
Here is a quote from http://wiki.qemu.org/QOMConventions
> a FooClass structure definition containing at least the parent class
> field:
>
> typedef struct {
> /*< private >*/
> MyParentClass parent_class;
> /*< public >*/
>
> [any fields
