Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 06:02 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>The problem is to be able to send 64 bit memory and disk offsets
> >>faithfully. This doesn't just fail to solve the problem, it's
> >>actually going to make it a whole lot worse.
> >
> >Such offs
On 05/23/2011 06:02 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The problem is to be able to send 64 bit memory and disk offsets
faithfully. This doesn't just fail to solve the problem, it's
actually going to make it a whole lot worse.
Such offsets would be so much more readable in hexa
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The problem is to be able to send 64 bit memory and disk offsets
> faithfully. This doesn't just fail to solve the problem, it's
> actually going to make it a whole lot worse.
Such offsets would be so much more readable in hexadecimal.
So why not use a string "0x8