Am Montag, den 18.12.2006, 00:56 -0800 schrieb Diwaker Gupta:
> > as far as i remember i had to put the same code into softmmu_header.h to
> > get "correct" results.
> > i found it easiest to do this in the ld/st macros in these files (~6
> > places in code)
>
> This probably sounds stupid but wha
as far as i remember i had to put the same code into softmmu_header.h to
get "correct" results.
i found it easiest to do this in the ld/st macros in these files (~6
places in code)
This probably sounds stupid but whats the best way to get debug
output? Due to the code generation magic qemu does,
Am Samstag, den 16.12.2006, 23:19 -0800 schrieb Diwaker Gupta:
> On 12/16/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> > > o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
> > > read/write memory accesses don
On 12/16/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
> read/write memory accesses done by the guest? I was concerned because
> when I start a guest, I see a who
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:42:46PM -0800, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> o do these changes seem correct? As in, do they actually track the
> read/write memory accesses done by the guest? I was concerned because
> when I start a guest, I see a whole lot of writes and not as many
> reads, which seems a litt
Hi list,
I've searched the archives and the forums, but couldn't get a specific
solution (I think my search terms might have been too general).
Anyways, I think what I'm trying to do should be relatively easy and
hopefully experts here will be able to quickly point me in the right
direction :)
S
