Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Perhaps you could submit your printf's so other people can learn from
> them please?
Well, most of them I no longer have; they slowed things down, so I
deleted them once I had the problems fixed. Besides, they were probably
too idiosyncratic to help other people much.
Ho
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 14:31 +0100, wangji wrote:
francis,
why not leave your development_available as readonly_access (svn_like or=20
anyftp) it would be great for learning !
I probably will release it once I finish my thesis. However, at present, it's not in good shape to be built by oth
francis,
why not leave your development_available as readonly_access (svn_like or
anyftp) it would be great for learning !
(to complement wikipedia_microkernel !!! )
just to recall on linux_kernel stuff
1998 Bowman effort's reverse eng
concrete (as-built) architecture of the Linux kernel : (199
Hi,
On 11/7/06, John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wanted to send a thank-you for developing QEMU. I'm writing an OS
for my master's thesis, and having an open-source emulation of the CPU
has been a *huge* help. At least three times now, there's been some
subtlety that I couldn't fig
Just wanted to send a thank-you for developing QEMU. I'm writing an OS
for my master's thesis, and having an open-source emulation of the CPU
has been a *huge* help. At least three times now, there's been some
subtlety that I couldn't figure out from the CPU docs, so I adding some
printf()s to QE
Just a quick thank-you for the x86_64 support; I'm currently working on the
initrd on the install cd for slamd64 (a amd64 port of Slackware), and your
work has saved me both countless hours and money (in the cost of useless
CDRs).
Regards,
--
Fred Emmott
(http://www.fredemmott.co.uk)
__
