Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 09:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>One problem is that this is libvirt version specific. For example,
> >>libvirt x doesn't support spice so we control that thorough qmp. But
> >>libvirt x+1 does support spice and now it gets confused about all the
On 03/23/2010 09:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
One problem is that this is libvirt version specific. For example,
libvirt x doesn't support spice so we control that thorough qmp. But
libvirt x+1 does support spice and now it gets confused about all the
spice messages.
That's only a prob
On 03/23/2010 12:57 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/22/2010 09:25 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
I've mentioned this to a few folks already but I wanted to start a
proper thread.
We're struggling in qemu with usability and one area that concerns me
is the disparity in features that are supporte
On 03/22/2010 09:25 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
I've mentioned this to a few folks already but I wanted to start a
proper thread.
We're struggling in qemu with usability and one area that concerns me
is the disparity in features that are supported by qemu vs what's
implemented in libvirt
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:25:00PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've mentioned this to a few folks already but I wanted to start a
> proper thread.
>
> We're struggling in qemu with usability and one area that concerns me is
> the disparity in features that are supported by qemu vs w
Hi,
I've mentioned this to a few folks already but I wanted to start a
proper thread.
We're struggling in qemu with usability and one area that concerns me is
the disparity in features that are supported by qemu vs what's
implemented in libvirt.
This isn't necessarily libvirt's problem if
