On 24/02/13 12:44, Andreas Färber wrote:
The commit you reference does nothing with block or IDE but with mips,
so is very unlikely to be the cause.
I was asking if you have narrowed down whether this is a regression or
not. If so then a git-bisect would hopefully give us some more insight.
(
Am 24.02.2013 13:40, schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland:
> On 24/02/13 12:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>> Have you tried a revision before my macio refactoring? It changed which
>> IDE code paths are taken.
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> It's a git pull as of a few hours ago (commit
> a345481baa2b2fb3d54f8c9ddb58dfca
On 24/02/13 12:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
Have you tried a revision before my macio refactoring? It changed which
IDE code paths are taken.
Hi Andreas,
It's a git pull as of a few hours ago (commit
a345481baa2b2fb3d54f8c9ddb58dfcaf75786df) if that helps?
Many thanks,
Mark.
Hi Mark,
Am 24.02.2013 13:08, schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland:
> Whilst running through some OpenBIOS tests, I came across the following
> segfault in qemu-system-ppc with -M mac99 on git master. It is
> consistently reproducible here with my test openSUSE image although
> strangely all my other images s
Hi all,
Whilst running through some OpenBIOS tests, I came across the following
segfault in qemu-system-ppc with -M mac99 on git master. It is
consistently reproducible here with my test openSUSE image although
strangely all my other images seem to run fine. The host is running
amd64 Debian W
