On 9/7/2010 9:41 AM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
This quick test is with QEMU patches that are on mailing lists but not merged
into mainline.
Bei
Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
>> Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>> [snip]
>> This quick test is with QEMU patches that are on mailing lists but not merged
>> into mainline.
>> Being said that, I don't think they really
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
> Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [snip]
> This quick test is with QEMU patches that are on mailing lists but not merged
> into mainline.
> Being said that, I don't think they really affect this.
is there any wor
Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Every time I try to rsync something to my 9p fs mounted I get the following
> message on guest kernel:
>
> 8<
> [ 45.866789] 9pnet_virtio virtio2: requests:id 0 is not a head!
> 8<
>
> I'm "sending" the FS with the foll
