2010/2/18 Rob Landley :
> On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> 2010/2/17 Rob Landley :
>> qemu-sparc can decently run debian-40r8: gcc and all the other stuff
>> seem to work.
>>
>> Most versions of the NetBSD boot. Some require the original OBP
>> though. The only known
2010/2/18 Rob Landley :
> On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:38:01 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> 2010/2/17 Blue Swirl :
>> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> >>> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> >>>
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:38:01 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> 2010/2/17 Blue Swirl :
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >>> >> I've also got a bunch of "s
On Thursday 18 February 2010 05:21:16 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> 2010/2/17 Rob Landley :
> qemu-sparc can decently run debian-40r8: gcc and all the other stuff
> seem to work.
>
> Most versions of the NetBSD boot. Some require the original OBP
> though. The only known to me version which definetely
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 14:46:15 Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Alas the image has no hint how to reproduce it. Doesn't say what
> > toolchain it was built with, what kernel .config was used, and so on.
> > (The arm one at least had /proc/config.gz...)
> >
> > Well, actually if you "mount -t proc pr
2010/2/17 Blue Swirl :
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>>> >> I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough
>>> >> to run builds natively under"
2010/2/17 Rob Landley :
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> >> I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough
>> >> to run builds natively under" targets on top of that (arm big
>> >> endian, sh4, sparc.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> >> I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough
>> >> to run builds natively under" targets on top of that (arm
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 09:45:48 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >> I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough
> >> to run builds natively under" targets on top of that (arm big
> >> endian, sh4, sparc...)
> >
> > What's not well en
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 03:24:58 Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> > I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough to run
> > builds natively under" targets on top of that (arm big endian, sh4,
> > sparc...)
>
> What's not well enough on sparc?
More than one thing, unfortunately. (
On 02/17/2010 10:24 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough
to run builds natively under" targets on top of that (arm big
endian, sh4, sparc...)
What's not well enough on sparc?
From http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/63610:
2010/2/16 Rob Landley :
> On Tuesday 16 February 2010 03:31:16 Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 16.02.2010, at 01:52, Rob Landley wrote:
>> If swapping the parameter was the right solution I would've submitted a
>> patch long ago :-). Unfortunately it's not as easy.
>
> I agree that making a single cont
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 03:31:16 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.02.2010, at 01:52, Rob Landley wrote:
> If swapping the parameter was the right solution I would've submitted a
> patch long ago :-). Unfortunately it's not as easy.
I agree that making a single controller handle four drives is a _
On 16.02.2010, at 01:52, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 07:08:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 06:58:33AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> On Monday 15 February 2010 05:19:24 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 15.02.2010, at 12:10, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunda
On Monday 15 February 2010 07:08:33 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 06:58:33AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Monday 15 February 2010 05:19:24 Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > On 15.02.2010, at 12:10, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 14 February 2010 08:41:00 Alexander Graf wro
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 06:58:33AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 05:19:24 Alexander Graf wrote:
> > On 15.02.2010, at 12:10, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Sunday 14 February 2010 08:41:00 Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >> So the only case I can imagine that this breaks anything is
16 matches
Mail list logo
