> According to comment in exec-all.h:
> /* Deterministic execution requires that IO only be performed on the last
>instruction of a TB so that interrupts take effect immediately. */
>
> Sparc generator must then violate this assumption. Is the assumption
> valid also when not using icount and
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> 2009/12/7 Blue Swirl :
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
>>> or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
>>> hardw
2009/12/7 Blue Swirl :
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
>> or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
>> hardware due to tcg optimizations?
>>
>> I see one test pattern which
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
> or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
> hardware due to tcg optimizations?
>
> I see one test pattern which fails on qemu:
>
>
> nop * N
>
