David S. Ahern wrote:
>
> On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> David S. Ahern wrote:
>>> After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
>>> send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
>>> branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for ea
David S. Ahern wrote:
>
> On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the
> last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and
> stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to
On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the
last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and
stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to
16k versus the EHCI spe
On 14.04.2010, at 01:50, David S. Ahern wrote:
>
>
> On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> David S. Ahern wrote:
>>> After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
>>> send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
>>> branch; I also attached t
On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> David S. Ahern wrote:
>> After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
>> send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
>> branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for easier reading.
>
> Thanks for
David S. Ahern wrote:
> After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
> send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
> branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for easier reading.
Thanks for your work! I applied it and once again merged git he
