Yes, I think so.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:31:33PM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
>> Please see bonito64_pcibios_config_access() in
>> arch/mips/pci/ops-bonito64.c of Linux kernel code.
>> You will find something useful.
>
>
> Thanks!
> I f
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:31:33PM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
> Please see bonito64_pcibios_config_access() in
> arch/mips/pci/ops-bonito64.c of Linux kernel code.
> You will find something useful.
Thanks!
I found this:
/* Clear aborts */
BONITO_PCICMD |= BONITO_PCICMD_MABORT_CLR
Please see bonito64_pcibios_config_access() in
arch/mips/pci/ops-bonito64.c of Linux kernel code.
You will find something useful.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:57:01AM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
>> Because the code in PMON and Linux kernel
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:57:01AM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
> Because the code in PMON and Linux kernel use these bits to verify r/w
> operations. If one of them is 1 after r/w, PMON and Linux will
> consider r/w has failed.
Where's that code in Linux?
> I guess that software will not set them t
Because the code in PMON and Linux kernel use these bits to verify r/w
operations. If one of them is 1 after r/w, PMON and Linux will
consider r/w has failed.
I guess that software will not set them to 1, because it is set by
hardware when operation fails.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Michael
