On 04.01.2011, at 15:22, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 08:16 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 01/04/11 14:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2011 07:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
>> Windows guests needs some registry hackery and Linux guests some
>> udev rules
>>>
On 01/04/2011 08:16 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 01/04/11 14:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/04/2011 07:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Windows guests needs some registry hackery and Linux guests some
udev rules
to enable remote wakeup permanently.
That commit inspired me to look at UHCI. I
On 01/04/11 14:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/04/2011 07:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Windows guests needs some registry hackery and Linux guests some
udev rules
to enable remote wakeup permanently.
That commit inspired me to look at UHCI. If the solution requires
modifying the guest th
On 01/04/2011 07:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Windows guests needs some registry hackery and Linux guests some
udev rules
to enable remote wakeup permanently.
That commit inspired me to look at UHCI. If the solution requires
modifying the guest then it is not widely useful.
Well, lon
Hi,
Windows guests needs some registry hackery and Linux guests some udev rules
to enable remote wakeup permanently.
That commit inspired me to look at UHCI. If the solution requires
modifying the guest then it is not widely useful.
Well, long-term this shouldn't be a big issue. I expect
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 01/04/11 12:48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> CPU utilization is a known issue with UHCI emulation. I spent a short
>> time poking around the code and USB specifications trying to come up
>> with a way to detect "idle" periods where we don
On 01/04/11 12:48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
CPU utilization is a known issue with UHCI emulation. I spent a short
time poking around the code and USB specifications trying to come up
with a way to detect "idle" periods where we don't need to poll the
frame list at 1000 Hz.
Check out
http://cgit
