Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Solaris/SPARC binaries

2005-08-01 Thread Blue Swirl
well, just to let you know ... I'm interested in the emulator (is there some howto available, regarding openprom and such?) http://www.openfirmware.org/ I've learned most things by reading the sources (Proll, Linux arch/sparc/prom, silo). Luckily, the code base is not large. A nice way of ge

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Solaris/SPARC binaries

2005-08-01 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote: > Hi, > > Sparc V8 system emulator is very much complete, but in practice some hidden > bugs in it (and also bugs in Proll's Openprom support) make the emulator > fragile. It can only run Linux 2.6 series, 2.4 or BSDs won't run. Probabl

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Solaris/SPARC binaries

2005-07-29 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
You wrote: > Probably some heavy debugging could make a difference, but it seems that > general > interest for the emulator is low. > > I haven't tried Solaris for Sparc V8, it would be interesting to hear the > results. Actually, I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only one who really wants to us

[Qemu-devel] Re: Solaris/SPARC binaries

2005-07-29 Thread Blue Swirl
Hi, Sparc V8 system emulator is very much complete, but in practice some hidden bugs in it (and also bugs in Proll's Openprom support) make the emulator fragile. It can only run Linux 2.6 series, 2.4 or BSDs won't run. Probably some heavy debugging could make a difference, but it seems that ge