Am 04.01.2010 um 19:33 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have
benefited
from being on the list, point it out. People are reasonable and
if you
have a good suggestion, they'll
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:04:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> >> > Likewise, if you see a patch go in th
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:49:10PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:04:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:47:00PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I am still waiting for you to list patches from Anthony or me,
Why should I go look for them? I thought you basically agreed it's a
good idea to post patches publically either before or - for trivial
patches - after commit?
--
MS
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:04:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> > Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have benefited
> >> > from being on the list,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> > Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have benefited
>> > from being on the list, point it out. People are reasonable and if you
>> > have a good su
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:33:56PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have benefited
> > > from being on the list, point it out. People are reasonable and if you
> >
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have benefited
> > from being on the list, point it out. People are reasonable and if you
> > have a good suggestion, they'll value your input and be likely to seek
