Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.09.2010 15:52, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 09/15/2010 08:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 15.09.2010 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> >>> On 09/15/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> No, we don't really care if the L2 entry is on disk. If the guest want to have its data

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 09/15/2010 08:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 15.09.2010 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 09/15/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: No, we don't really care if the L2 entry is on disk. If the guest want to have its data safe it needs to issue an explicit flush anyway. The only thing we

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.09.2010 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 09/15/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> No, we don't really care if the L2 entry is on disk. If the guest want >> to have its data safe it needs to issue an explicit flush anyway. The >> only thing we want to achieve with bdrv_write_sync is to ma

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 09/15/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: No, we don't really care if the L2 entry is on disk. If the guest want to have its data safe it needs to issue an explicit flush anyway. The only thing we want to achieve with bdrv_write_sync is to maintain the right order between metadata updates to surv

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.09.2010 14:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 09/15/2010 03:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 14.09.2010 17:11, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> >>> On 09/14/2010 09:47 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >>> 0.13 - if all goes well...tomorrow >>> To tag, it may be thursday f

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 09/15/2010 03:30 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 14.09.2010 17:11, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On 09/14/2010 09:47 AM, Chris Wright wrote: 0.13 - if all goes well...tomorrow To tag, it may be thursday for announcement. I need to run a regression run tonight. qed/qcow2 - in

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 14.09.2010 17:11, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 09/14/2010 09:47 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >> 0.13 >> - if all goes well...tomorrow >> > > To tag, it may be thursday for announcement. I need to run a regression > run tonight. > >> qed/qcow2 >> - increase concurrency, performance >> >

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Sept 14

2010-09-14 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 09/14/2010 09:47 AM, Chris Wright wrote: 0.13 - if all goes well...tomorrow To tag, it may be thursday for announcement. I need to run a regression run tonight. qed/qcow2 - increase concurrency, performance To achieve performance, a block driver must: 1) support concurrent re