On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > KVM/qemu patches
> > - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
> > - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
> > - will slow
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> KVM/qemu patches
>>> - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
>>> - patches need to include bet
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Can't hurt reviewer motivation. Could it be automated? Find replies,
> extract tags. If you want your acks to be picked up, you better make
> sure your References header works, and your tags are formatted
> correctly.
I think pwclient (https
On 06/15/2010 05:18 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
- size for each section would be useful (breaks protocol)
- while size is possibly useful, breaks protocol
It is not necessary to break the protocol. If you're okay with only
having the size information when the migration data has been saved to a
2010/6/16 Markus Armbruster :
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>
>> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>>
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include be
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>> KVM/qemu patches
>>> - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
>>> - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
- will slow down patch writers
- wil
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> KVM/qemu patches
> - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
> - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
> - will slow down patch writers
> - will make it easier for patch reviewers
What is th
